Americas vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Americas
-612 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Americas rank
9th
Namibia rank
7th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Americas
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against -612 t in Americas, a difference of 612 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Americas ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 10 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Americas or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0 t against -612 t in Americas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Americas and Namibia?
- 612 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Americas and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Americas ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.