Afghanistan vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production

Afghanistan
500 t
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
846.66 t
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
10th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
13th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2505007501.0k1.2k1.5k196119922024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 846.66 t against 500 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 346.66 t.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 1.7 times Afghanistan's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 10th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 13th of 31 countries.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 494.44 t 932.56 t 438.11 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1970s 543 t 986.1 t 443.1 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 500 t 754.7 t 254.7 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 500 t 772.02 t 272.02 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 500 t 877.95 t 377.95 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 500 t 893.09 t 393.09 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 500 t 870.17 t 370.17 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production, Afghanistan or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 846.66 t against 500 t in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production between Afghanistan and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
346.66 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production?
Afghanistan ranks 10th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-production-2/afghanistan/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-production-2/afghanistan/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Afghanistan vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
57 places, 3,034 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.