Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
4,187 t
in 2023
Thailand
2,079 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th
Thailand rank
4th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Thailand
02.0k4.0k6.0k201020162023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 4,187 t against 2,079 t in Thailand, a difference of 2,108 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Thailand ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 4th of 15 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Thailand Difference Ahead
2010s 4,228 t 4,955 t 726.36 t Thailand
2020s 4,203 t 3,123 t 1,080 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Thailand?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 4,187 t against 2,079 t in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
2,108 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 4th of 15 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
34 places, 341 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.