India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed

India
259,420 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
21,914 t
in 2023
India rank
1st
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed over time

  • India
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k201420182023

How they compare

India currently reports 259,420 t against 21,914 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 237,506 t.

That makes India's figure about 11.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

India ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 14 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 1,457 t 1,457 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 241,808 t 21,901 t 219,908 t India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed, India or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
India, at 259,420 t against 21,914 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed between India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
237,506 t, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed?
India ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/india/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/india/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
34 places, 341 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.