Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed

Afghanistan
493.15 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
493.15 t
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
6th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
9th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0200400600201020162023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 493.15 t against 493.15 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 0 t.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 6th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 14 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 500 t 500 t 0 t
2020s 496.06 t 525.35 t 29.29 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed, Afghanistan or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Afghanistan, at 493.15 t against 493.15 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed between Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
0 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — processed?
Afghanistan ranks 6th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-processed/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Afghanistan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Processed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
34 places, 341 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.