Oceania vs Zambia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity
Oceania
0.02 t
in 2022
Zambia
0.66 t
in 2023
Oceania rank
21st
Zambia rank
23rd
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity over time
- Oceania
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.66 t against 0.02 t in Oceania, a difference of 0.64 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 33.0 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Oceania ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 28 groups.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0017 t | 8.43 t | 8.43 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.015 t | 0.64 t | 0.625 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity, Oceania or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.66 t against 0.02 t in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity between Oceania and Zambia?
- 0.64 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Oceania and Zambia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity?
- Oceania ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.