Iceland vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity

Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Iceland rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
00.20.40.6201020162023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.

Iceland ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 80 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity, Iceland or Namibia?
Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity between Iceland and Namibia?
0 t, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity?
Iceland ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
111 places, 1,114 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.