Georgia vs Malawi: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity

Georgia
0.01 t
in 2014
Malawi
0.01 t
in 2016
Georgia rank
53rd
Malawi rank
53rd

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity over time

  • Georgia
  • Malawi
051015201020132016

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.01 t against 0.01 t in Malawi, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 53rd of 80 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity, Georgia or Malawi?
Georgia, at 0.01 t against 0.01 t in Malawi as of 2014.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity between Georgia and Malawi?
0 t, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2014.
How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity?
Georgia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 53rd of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
111 places, 1,114 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.