Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2021
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Australia and New Zealand rank
55th
Namibia rank
55th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Namibia
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 55th of 73 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Namibia?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 55th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.