Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2021
Eswatini
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
55th
Eswatini rank
55th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eswatini
00.050.10.150.2201020162023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Eswatini, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 55th of 73 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 0.035 t 0.02 t 0.015 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0 t 0.01 t 0.01 t Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Eswatini?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini?
0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 55th of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/eswatini/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
111 places, 1,114 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.