India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number

India
139.75
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
118.9
in 2024
India rank
3rd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number over time

  • India
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050100150196119922024

How they compare

India currently reports 139.75 against 118.9 in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 20.85.

That makes India's figure about 1.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

India ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 22 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 5 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 12.58 1.8 10.78 India
1970s 20.66 1.98 18.69 India
1980s 37.38 1.82 35.56 India
1990s 49.18 56.72 7.53 Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 60.72 76.64 15.92 Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 96.06 87.93 8.13 India
2020s 131.93 100 31.93 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production index number, India or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
India, at 139.75 against 118.9 in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production index number between India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
20.85, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do India and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production index number?
India ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/india/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/india/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">India vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
46 places, 2,613 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.