Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
79.48 t
in 2023
South Africa
16.27 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th
South Africa rank
8th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
0200400600201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 79.48 t against 16.27 t in South Africa, a difference of 63.21 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.9 times South Africa's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 8th of 25 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 167.21 t 2.01 t 165.19 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 205.31 t 4.7 t 200.61 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — export quantity, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 79.48 t against 16.27 t in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — export quantity between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
63.21 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — export quantity?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 8th of 25 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-export-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-export-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 829 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.