Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs South Africa: Silk waste — Residuals
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0 t
in 2023
South Africa
3 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd
South Africa rank
3rd
Silk waste — Residuals over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3 t against 0 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 3 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -65.5 t | -1.2 t | 64.3 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | -1 t | 2.25 t | 3.25 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk waste — residuals, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 3 t against 0 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk waste — residuals between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
- 3 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa rank globally for silk waste — residuals?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.