Eastern Africa vs Sweden: Silk waste — Residuals
Eastern Africa
0 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Eastern Africa rank
5th
Sweden rank
8th
Silk waste — Residuals over time
- Eastern Africa
- Sweden
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 8th of 28 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.6 t | 0.005 t | 3.6 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | -1.75 t | 0 t | 1.75 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk waste — residuals, Eastern Africa or Sweden?
- Eastern Africa, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk waste — residuals between Eastern Africa and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Sweden rank globally for silk waste — residuals?
- Eastern Africa ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 8th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.