Barbados vs Botswana: Silk waste — Residuals

Barbados
0 t
in 2018
Botswana
0 t
in 2023
Barbados rank
10th
Botswana rank
10th

Silk waste — Residuals over time

  • Barbados
  • Botswana
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0201020162023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Botswana, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Botswana ahead.

Barbados ranks 10th and Botswana ranks 10th of 102 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk waste — residuals, Barbados or Botswana?
Barbados, at 0 t against 0 t in Botswana as of 2018.
What is the difference in silk waste — residuals between Barbados and Botswana?
0 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for silk waste — residuals?
Barbados ranks 10th and Botswana ranks 10th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Silk waste — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 1,435 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.