Australia vs Denmark: Silk waste — Residuals
Australia
0 t
in 2023
Denmark
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
10th
Denmark rank
10th
Silk waste — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Denmark
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Denmark, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Denmark ahead.
Australia ranks 10th and Denmark ranks 10th of 102 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.6 t | 0.6 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk waste — residuals, Australia or Denmark?
- Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk waste — residuals between Australia and Denmark?
- 0 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for silk waste — residuals?
- Australia ranks 10th and Denmark ranks 10th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.