Oceania vs Uganda: Silk waste — Other uses
Oceania
7.58 t
in 2023
Uganda
9.15 t
in 2017
Oceania rank
18th
Uganda rank
15th
Silk waste — Other uses over time
- Oceania
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 9.15 t against 7.58 t in Oceania, a difference of 1.57 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 15th of 27 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk waste — other uses, Oceania or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 9.15 t against 7.58 t in Oceania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in silk waste — other uses between Oceania and Uganda?
- 1.57 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do Oceania and Uganda rank globally for silk waste — other uses?
- Oceania ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 15th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.