Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Silk waste — Import quantity

Small island developing States (SIDS)
0.9 t
in 2022
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
79.37 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
8th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
10th

Silk waste — Import quantity over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
050100150201020162023

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 79.37 t against 0.9 t in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 78.47 t.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 88.2 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 10th of 10 groups.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 2.02 t 93.17 t 91.15 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 0.71 t 120.13 t 119.42 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk waste — import quantity, Small island developing States (SIDS) or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 79.37 t against 0.9 t in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk waste — import quantity between Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
78.47 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for silk waste — import quantity?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 10th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk waste — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Silk waste — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-waste-import-quantity/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-waste-import-quantity/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Silk waste — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk waste — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
119 places, 1,272 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.