Brazil vs Land locked developing countries: Silk β€” Other uses

Brazil
3,241 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries
34,538 t
in 2013
Brazil rank
7th
Land locked developing countries rank
3rd

Silk β€” Other uses over time

  • Brazil
  • Land locked developing countries
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119872013

How they compare

Land locked developing countries currently reports 34,538 t against 3,241 t in Brazil, a difference of 31,297 t.

That makes Land locked developing countries's figure about 10.7 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 7th and Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd of 99 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Land locked developing countries in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Land locked developing countries Difference Ahead
1960s 1,678 t 543.89 t 1,134 t Brazil
1970s 6,625 t 578 t 6,047 t Brazil
1980s 12,182 t 553.7 t 11,628 t Brazil
1990s 18,026 t 21,642 t 3,616 t Land locked developing countries
2000s 9,776 t 27,031 t 17,254 t Land locked developing countries
2010s 3,617 t 33,368 t 29,751 t Land locked developing countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk β€” other uses, Brazil or Land locked developing countries?
Land locked developing countries, at 34,538 t against 3,241 t in Brazil as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk β€” other uses between Brazil and Land locked developing countries?
31,297 t, with Land locked developing countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Land locked developing countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Brazil and Land locked developing countries rank globally for silk β€” other uses?
Brazil ranks 7th and Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk β€” Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Land locked developing countries: Silk β€” Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries/">Brazil vs Land locked developing countries: Silk β€” Other uses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk β€” Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 6,574 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.