Kyrgyzstan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Domestic supply quantity

Kyrgyzstan
150 t
in 2013
Small island developing States
3 t
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Small island developing States rank
23rd

Silk — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Small island developing States
-1.0k-50005001.0k196119872013

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 150 t against 3 t in Small island developing States, a difference of 147 t.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 50.0 times Small island developing States's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Small island developing States ranks 23rd of 110 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Small island developing States Difference Ahead
1990s 346.88 t -4.62 t 351.5 t Kyrgyzstan
2000s 215.1 t 20.6 t 194.5 t Kyrgyzstan
2010s 150 t 3 t 147 t Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — domestic supply quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Small island developing States?
Kyrgyzstan, at 150 t against 3 t in Small island developing States as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — domestic supply quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Small island developing States?
147 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Small island developing States?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Small island developing States rank globally for silk — domestic supply quantity?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Small island developing States ranks 23rd of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-domestic-supply-quantity/kyrgyz-republic/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-domestic-supply-quantity/kyrgyz-republic/small-island-developing-states/">Kyrgyzstan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 6,929 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.