Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
211,429 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
7,614 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 211,429 t against 7,614 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 203,815 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 27.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 25 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 202,658 t 7,531 t 195,127 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 209,896 t 7,653 t 202,242 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — production, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 211,429 t against 7,614 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — production between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
203,815 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — production?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 25 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/shorn-wool-greasy-including-fleece-washed-shorn-wool-production/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/shorn-wool-greasy-including-fleece-washed-shorn-wool-production/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Shorn wool, greasy, including fleece-washed shorn wool — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 1,566 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.