Belgium vs Luxembourg: Sheep — Stocks, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Luxembourg
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
148th
Luxembourg rank
151st
Sheep — Stocks, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 An per US$ of GDP.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.8 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 148th and Luxembourg ranks 151st of 158 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sheep — stocks, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Luxembourg?
- Belgium, at 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sheep — stocks, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Luxembourg?
- 0 An per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Luxembourg?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Belgium and Luxembourg rank globally for sheep — stocks, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 148th and Luxembourg ranks 151st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Stocks, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sheep — Stocks divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.