Latvia vs Saint Lucia: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Saint Lucia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
110th
Saint Lucia rank
108th
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 110th and Saint Lucia ranks 108th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Saint Lucia rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 110th and Saint Lucia ranks 108th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.