Mauritius vs Sweden: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0004 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Mauritius rank
118th
Sweden rank
115th

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sweden
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 118th and Sweden ranks 115th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2017.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Sweden?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 118th and Sweden ranks 115th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sweden: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sweden/">Mauritius vs Sweden: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.