Mauritius vs Namibia: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
118th
Namibia rank
117th

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Namibia
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 117th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Namibia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 117th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.