Dominica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Dominica
0.0021 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0019 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
78th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
81st

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.0021 t per square kilometre against 0.0019 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Dominica ranks 78th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0047 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0048 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.008 t per square kilometre 0.0065 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Dominica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Dominica, at 0.0021 t per square kilometre against 0.0019 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Dominica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 78th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/dominica/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/dominica/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Dominica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.