Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uruguay: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0082 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0088 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
37th
Uruguay rank
35th

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Uruguay
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0088 t per square kilometre against 0.0082 t per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 35th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0075 t per square kilometre 0.0234 t per square kilometre 0.0158 t per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.0094 t per square kilometre 0.0134 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0073 t per square kilometre 0.0093 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0088 t per square kilometre against 0.0082 t per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 35th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uruguay: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/uruguay/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uruguay: Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.