Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Eswatini
0.5417 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.5646 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
120th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
118th

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.5646 An per square kilometre against 0.5417 An per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0229 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 118th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5297 An per square kilometre 0.5375 An per square kilometre 0.0078 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.7849 An per square kilometre 0.322 An per square kilometre 0.4629 An per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.8052 An per square kilometre 0.3786 An per square kilometre 0.4266 An per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.6317 An per square kilometre 0.4854 An per square kilometre 0.1462 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.6726 An per square kilometre 0.6292 An per square kilometre 0.0434 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.5057 An per square kilometre 0.4616 An per square kilometre 0.0441 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.5307 An per square kilometre 0.5193 An per square kilometre 0.0114 An per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.5646 An per square kilometre against 0.5417 An per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0229 An per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 118th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.