Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Bahamas
0.2156 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1749 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.2156 An per square kilometre against 0.1749 An per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0407 An per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 160 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6627 An per square kilometre 0.1945 An per square kilometre 0.4682 An per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.4156 An per square kilometre 0.2262 An per square kilometre 0.1893 An per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.2218 An per square kilometre 0.1163 An per square kilometre 0.1055 An per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.1643 An per square kilometre 0.0954 An per square kilometre 0.0689 An per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.1866 An per square kilometre 0.0971 An per square kilometre 0.0895 An per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.2048 An per square kilometre 0.0919 An per square kilometre 0.1129 An per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.2132 An per square kilometre 0.1447 An per square kilometre 0.0685 An per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Bahamas, at 0.2156 An per square kilometre against 0.1749 An per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.0407 An per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Bahamas ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.