Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita

Bahamas
0.0054 An per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0052 An per person
in 2024
Bahamas rank
131st
Equatorial Guinea rank
132nd

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita over time

  • Bahamas
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0054 An per person against 0.0052 An per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0002 An per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 131st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0453 An per person 0.0178 An per person 0.0274 An per person Bahamas
1970s 0.0204 An per person 0.0211 An per person 0.0006 An per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0089 An per person 0.0188 An per person 0.0098 An per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0055 An per person 0.014 An per person 0.0085 An per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0054 An per person 0.0096 An per person 0.0042 An per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0054 An per person 0.0065 An per person 0.0012 An per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0054 An per person 0.0054 An per person 0 An per person Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita, Bahamas or Equatorial Guinea?
Bahamas, at 0.0054 An per person against 0.0052 An per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita between Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0002 An per person, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for sheep fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita?
Bahamas ranks 131st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/">Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.