Panama vs Serbia: Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment
Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment over time
- Panama
- Serbia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 72.48 % against 64.4 % in Serbia, a difference of 8.08 %.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 27th of 67 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.39 % | 71.09 % | 12.3 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 65.67 % | 70.94 % | 5.26 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment, Panama or Serbia?
- Panama, at 72.48 % against 64.4 % in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment between Panama and Serbia?
- 8.08 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Panama and Serbia rank globally for share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment?
- Panama ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 27th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total AFS employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.