Bhutan vs Zambia: Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment
Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment over time
- Bhutan
- Zambia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 95.72 % against 94.86 % in Zambia, a difference of 0.86 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 7th of 67 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 96.88 % | 95.94 % | 0.94 % | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 95.76 % | 94.92 % | 0.846 % | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment, Bhutan or Zambia?
- Bhutan, at 95.72 % against 94.86 % in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment between Bhutan and Zambia?
- 0.86 %, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Zambia rank globally for share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment?
- Bhutan ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 7th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total AFS employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.