Angola vs Bhutan: Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment
Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment over time
- Angola
- Bhutan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 99.05 % against 99 % in Bhutan, a difference of 0.05 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Bhutan ahead.
Angola ranks 3rd and Bhutan ranks 4th of 65 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.81 % | 99.58 % | 0.77 % | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 99.54 % | 99 % | 0.534 % | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment, Angola or Bhutan?
- Angola, at 99.05 % against 99 % in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment between Angola and Bhutan?
- 0.05 %, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bhutan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Bhutan rank globally for share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment?
- Angola ranks 3rd and Bhutan ranks 4th of 65 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Agricultural employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.