Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Uganda: Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural
Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 96.56 % against 95.68 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 0.88 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uganda ahead.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 96.56 % against 95.68 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Uganda?
- 0.88 %, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Uganda rank globally for share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural agrifood systems — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.