Brazil vs Serbia: Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural
Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 39.11 % against 33.99 % in Brazil, a difference of 5.12 %.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 30th of 39 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 39.11 % against 33.99 % in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural between Brazil and Serbia?
- 5.12 %, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for share of informal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural?
- Brazil ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 30th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural agrifood systems — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.