Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value
Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 84.33 % against 77.23 % in Brazil, a difference of 7.1 %.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Brazil ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 39 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.56 % | 84.97 % | 0.41 % | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 81.2 % | 86.09 % | 4.89 % | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 84.33 % against 77.23 % in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.1 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value?
- Brazil ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.