Ecuador vs Panama: Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value
Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value over time
- Ecuador
- Panama
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 92.44 % against 91.52 % in Panama, a difference of 0.92 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Panama ranks 21st of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.19 % | 83.72 % | 7.47 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 84.74 % | 86.73 % | 1.99 % | Panama |
| 2020s | 91.76 % | 91.6 % | 0.16 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value, Ecuador or Panama?
- Ecuador, at 92.44 % against 91.52 % in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value between Ecuador and Panama?
- 0.92 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Panama ranks 21st of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.