Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value
Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 60.09 % against 58.73 % in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.36 %.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.81 % | 97.81 % | 31 % | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 62.1 % | 87.4 % | 25.3 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 60.09 % against 58.73 % in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 1.36 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for share of informal employment by industry and sex: agriculture — value?
- Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of informal employment by industry and sex: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.