Peru vs Rwanda: Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural
Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 20.98 % against 19.86 % in Peru, a difference of 1.12 %.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Rwanda ahead.
Peru ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 39 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.73 % | 26.01 % | 0.28 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 21.23 % | 22.25 % | 1.02 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of formal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural, Peru or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 20.98 % against 19.86 % in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of formal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural between Peru and Rwanda?
- 1.12 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for share of formal employment by industry and sex: non-agricultural?
- Peru ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Non-agricultural agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.