Guatemala vs Peru: Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems
Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems over time
- Guatemala
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 13.38 % against 11.16 % in Guatemala, a difference of 2.22 %.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 27th and Peru ranks 25th of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.31 % | 10.55 % | 2.76 % | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 9.23 % | 13.9 % | 4.67 % | Peru |
| 2020s | 10.8 % | 13.58 % | 2.78 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems, Guatemala or Peru?
- Peru, at 13.38 % against 11.16 % in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems between Guatemala and Peru?
- 2.22 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Peru rank globally for share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems?
- Guatemala ranks 27th and Peru ranks 25th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.