Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems
Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 27.73 % against 19.86 % in Namibia, a difference of 7.87 %.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Namibia ranks 17th of 39 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 27.73 % against 19.86 % in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 7.87 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for share of formal employment by industry and sex: agrifood systems?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Namibia ranks 17th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of formal employment by industry and sex: Agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.