Luxembourg vs Naoero: Share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by
Share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by over time
- Luxembourg
- Naoero
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.95 % against 0.83 % in Naoero, a difference of 0.12 %.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Naoero's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Naoero ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 141st and Naoero ranks 143rd of 145 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.21 % | 1.95 % | 0.7443 % | Naoero |
| 2020s | 0.975 % | 0.935 % | 0.04 % | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by, Luxembourg or Naoero?
- Luxembourg, at 0.95 % against 0.83 % in Naoero as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by between Luxembourg and Naoero?
- 0.12 %, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Naoero?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Naoero rank globally for share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by?
- Luxembourg ranks 141st and Naoero ranks 143rd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by subindustry and sex: Employment in agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.