Samoa vs Sudan: Share of employment by sex in industry: Total employment in agrifood
Share of employment by sex in industry: Total employment in agrifood over time
- Samoa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 79.42 % against 79.38 % in Samoa, a difference of 0.04 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 25th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.96 % | 69.52 % | 2.44 % | Samoa |
| 2010s | 76.2 % | 73.92 % | 2.28 % | Samoa |
| 2020s | 73.32 % | 78.77 % | 5.45 % | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employment by sex in industry: total employment in agrifood, Samoa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 79.42 % against 79.38 % in Samoa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of employment by sex in industry: total employment in agrifood between Samoa and Sudan?
- 0.04 %, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sudan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Samoa and Sudan rank globally for share of employment by sex in industry: total employment in agrifood?
- Samoa ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 25th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of employment by sex in industry: Total employment in agrifood systems — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.