Jordan vs South Africa: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 91.52 % against 89.68 % in Jordan, a difference of 1.84 %.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 68 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.09 % | 91.47 % | 8.38 % | South Africa |
| 2020s | 85.25 % | 89.29 % | 4.04 % | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Jordan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 91.52 % against 89.68 % in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Jordan and South Africa?
- 1.84 %, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Jordan ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Agricultural employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.