Czechia vs Jordan: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Czechia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 89.68 % against 67.99 % in Czechia, a difference of 21.69 %.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 4th of 68 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 69.45 % | 83.09 % | 13.64 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | 69.02 % | 85.25 % | 16.23 % | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Czechia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 89.68 % against 67.99 % in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Czechia and Jordan?
- 21.69 %, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Jordan rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Czechia ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 4th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Agricultural employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.