Philippines vs South America: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers

Philippines
61 %
in 2021
South America
36 %
in 2021
Philippines rank
25th
South America rank
27th

Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time

  • Philippines
  • South America
0204060200020102021

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 61 % against 36 % in South America, a difference of 25 %.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.7 times South America's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 25th and South America ranks 27th of 166 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines South America Difference Ahead
2000s 59.1 % 38.6 % 20.5 % Philippines
2010s 59.3 % 35.9 % 23.4 % Philippines
2020s 61.5 % 36 % 25.5 % Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Philippines or South America?
Philippines, at 61 % against 36 % in South America as of 2021.
What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Philippines and South America?
25 %, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South America?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Philippines and South America rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
Philippines ranks 25th and South America ranks 27th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs South America: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/philippines/south-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/philippines/south-america/">Philippines vs South America: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.