Myanmar vs Upper-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers

Myanmar
63 %
in 2021
Upper-middle-income economies
47 %
in 2021
Myanmar rank
21st
Upper-middle-income economies rank
19th

Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time

  • Myanmar
  • Upper-middle-income economies
0204060200020102021

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 63 % against 47 % in Upper-middle-income economies, a difference of 16 %.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times Upper-middle-income economies's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 21st and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 19th of 166 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Upper-middle-income economies Difference Ahead
2000s 59.5 % 53.9 % 5.6 % Myanmar
2010s 51.4 % 49.6 % 1.8 % Myanmar
2020s 63 % 47.5 % 15.5 % Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Myanmar or Upper-middle-income economies?
Myanmar, at 63 % against 47 % in Upper-middle-income economies as of 2021.
What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Myanmar and Upper-middle-income economies?
16 %, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Upper-middle-income economies?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Myanmar and Upper-middle-income economies rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
Myanmar ranks 21st and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 19th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Upper-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/myanmar/upper-middle-income-economies/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/myanmar/upper-middle-income-economies/">Myanmar vs Upper-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.