High-income economies vs Rwanda: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time
- High-income economies
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 56 % against 29 % in High-income economies, a difference of 27 %.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.9 times High-income economies's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
High-income economies ranks 33rd and Rwanda ranks 34th of 37 groups.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High-income economies | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6 % | 52 % | 19.4 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 30.2 % | 57.1 % | 26.9 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 29 % | 57 % | 28 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, High-income economies or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 56 % against 29 % in High-income economies as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between High-income economies and Rwanda?
- 27 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High-income economies and Rwanda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do High-income economies and Rwanda rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
- High-income economies ranks 33rd and Rwanda ranks 34th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.