Bangladesh vs Lower-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers

Bangladesh
72 %
in 2021
Lower-middle-income economies
56 %
in 2021
Bangladesh rank
7th
Lower-middle-income economies rank
10th

Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Lower-middle-income economies
020406080200020102021

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 72 % against 56 % in Lower-middle-income economies, a difference of 16 %.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times Lower-middle-income economies's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and Lower-middle-income economies ranks 10th of 166 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Lower-middle-income economies Difference Ahead
2000s 82.1 % 62.1 % 20 % Bangladesh
2010s 78.4 % 58.3 % 20.1 % Bangladesh
2020s 72.5 % 56.5 % 16 % Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Bangladesh or Lower-middle-income economies?
Bangladesh, at 72 % against 56 % in Lower-middle-income economies as of 2021.
What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Bangladesh and Lower-middle-income economies?
16 %, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Lower-middle-income economies?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Bangladesh and Lower-middle-income economies rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Lower-middle-income economies ranks 10th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Lower-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/bangladesh/lower-middle-income-economies/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/bangladesh/lower-middle-income-economies/">Bangladesh vs Lower-middle-income economies: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.