Argentina vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers

Argentina
34 %
in 2021
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
33 %
in 2021
Argentina rank
113th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
116th

Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time

  • Argentina
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
010203040200020102021

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 34 % against 33 % in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 1 %.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 113th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 116th of 166 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 36.7 % 31.7 % 5 % Argentina
2010s 35.2 % 32.6 % 2.6 % Argentina
2020s 33.5 % 33 % 0.5 % Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Argentina or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Argentina, at 34 % against 33 % in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2021.
What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Argentina and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
1 %, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Argentina and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
Argentina ranks 113th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 116th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/argentina/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-dietary-energy-supply-derived-from-cereals-roots-and-tubers-percent-3-year/argentina/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Argentina vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.